close
http://www.babyhome.com.tw/mboard.php?op=d&bid=39&sID=1988126&r=30&page=1
英國食品標準局的網站http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2008/sep/melamine
但是英國全面禁止中國製造的嬰兒奶粉喔：
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/milksimplifiedchinese.pdf
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/milktradchinese.pdf
歐盟的網站在此：
http://www.efsa.eu.int/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902098433.htm
歐盟的網站是說，在發生這樣的危機之下，你吃多少大概不會死...但會不會有啥不好的影響...很難說。畢竟健康的活著...跟得腎結石活著..一樣都是活著啦...而且他是用TDI的方式計算..跟我們的計算方式也不相同
High levels of melamine can primarily affect the kidneys. EFSA applied the TDI of 0.5 mg/kg body weight for melamine in a specific case of contamination in 2007[3].
[3] Because there is uncertainty with respect to the time scale for development of kidney damage, EFSA used the TDI of 0.5 mg/kg body weight which is protective for exposure over a lifetime in considering possible effects of exposure to melamine over a relatively short period, such as might occur with repeated consumption of melamine contaminated products
而且，歐盟強調在不完全的數據下，歐盟是用最高劑量情況，做最壞的推測。歐盟食品管理局強調，目前並不清楚這樣的三聚氰胺污染是否會在歐洲發生。
In the absence of available data for contaminated milk powder, EFSA also used the highest value of melamine, reported in Chinese infant formula as a basis for worst case scenarios. EFSA stressed that it is not known at the moment whether such theoretical high level exposure scenarios could occur in Europe.
衛生署的做法卻是去訂容許上限。所以跟台灣定標準的情況有些不同
http://www.nzfsa.govt.nz/publications/media-releases/2008/26-sep-melamine-res...
紐西蘭幼童標準是 1 ppm 非 5ppm
"However for starter infant formula, this level will be set to the current level of test detection of 1 ppm."
http://www.ausfoodnews.com.au/2008/09/26/food-safety-authorities-worldwide-re...
這其實和新聞中的"而英國食品標準局的網站，這兩天也在網頁發布歐盟食品安全委員會有關三聚氰胺容許量，也是訂為二點五ppm，並指歐洲販售乳製品含三聚氰胺風險很低。" 容許量的意義其實是不一樣的
如果大家不管全文, 只看其中一段的話,
那來看這一段,
Over the past week, our scientists have been exchanging information with their international colleagues. Last night, the European Food Safety Authority updated its opinion on the estimated tolerable daily intake (TDI) of melamine and left it unchanged at 0.5 mg/kg bodyweight
"TDI of melamine and left is unchanged at 0.5 mg/Kg bodyweight.", 也就是 0.5 ppm,
另外, 更大的重點是,
TDI 不是食品添加標準, 不要老是拿 TDI 出來辨護,
就像大便吃了不會死, 但商家可以把大便加到食品裏嗎?
你去小吃店叫一碗牛肉麵, 發現有 1 隻蒼蠅, 你向店家抗
議, 店家說, 依據標準, 蒼蠅要吃一萬隻才會有事, 我們只
有一隻, 要連吃一萬碗才會有事, 我們是合乎標準的, 是你
們太過緊張, 這種說法說得通嗎?
對食品來說, 一定是正面表列的東西才能添加, 其他的東西
就是不能加,
當然, 不能加的東西有時還是會不小心吃到, 這時就需要標準
來決定需要洗胃, 灌腸, ...... 等行動, 但不代表在明知道 "有"
的情形下, 大家吃沒關係,
英國食品標準局的網站http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2008/sep/melamine
但是英國全面禁止中國製造的嬰兒奶粉喔：
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/milksimplifiedchinese.pdf
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/milktradchinese.pdf
歐盟的網站在此：
http://www.efsa.eu.int/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902098433.htm
歐盟的網站是說，在發生這樣的危機之下，你吃多少大概不會死...但會不會有啥不好的影響...很難說。畢竟健康的活著...跟得腎結石活著..一樣都是活著啦...而且他是用TDI的方式計算..跟我們的計算方式也不相同
High levels of melamine can primarily affect the kidneys. EFSA applied the TDI of 0.5 mg/kg body weight for melamine in a specific case of contamination in 2007[3].
[3] Because there is uncertainty with respect to the time scale for development of kidney damage, EFSA used the TDI of 0.5 mg/kg body weight which is protective for exposure over a lifetime in considering possible effects of exposure to melamine over a relatively short period, such as might occur with repeated consumption of melamine contaminated products
而且，歐盟強調在不完全的數據下，歐盟是用最高劑量情況，做最壞的推測。歐盟食品管理局強調，目前並不清楚這樣的三聚氰胺污染是否會在歐洲發生。
In the absence of available data for contaminated milk powder, EFSA also used the highest value of melamine, reported in Chinese infant formula as a basis for worst case scenarios. EFSA stressed that it is not known at the moment whether such theoretical high level exposure scenarios could occur in Europe.
衛生署的做法卻是去訂容許上限。所以跟台灣定標準的情況有些不同
http://www.nzfsa.govt.nz/publications/media-releases/2008/26-sep-melamine-res...
紐西蘭幼童標準是 1 ppm 非 5ppm
"However for starter infant formula, this level will be set to the current level of test detection of 1 ppm."
http://www.ausfoodnews.com.au/2008/09/26/food-safety-authorities-worldwide-re...
這其實和新聞中的"而英國食品標準局的網站，這兩天也在網頁發布歐盟食品安全委員會有關三聚氰胺容許量，也是訂為二點五ppm，並指歐洲販售乳製品含三聚氰胺風險很低。" 容許量的意義其實是不一樣的
如果大家不管全文, 只看其中一段的話,
那來看這一段,
Over the past week, our scientists have been exchanging information with their international colleagues. Last night, the European Food Safety Authority updated its opinion on the estimated tolerable daily intake (TDI) of melamine and left it unchanged at 0.5 mg/kg bodyweight
"TDI of melamine and left is unchanged at 0.5 mg/Kg bodyweight.", 也就是 0.5 ppm,
另外, 更大的重點是,
TDI 不是食品添加標準, 不要老是拿 TDI 出來辨護,
就像大便吃了不會死, 但商家可以把大便加到食品裏嗎?
你去小吃店叫一碗牛肉麵, 發現有 1 隻蒼蠅, 你向店家抗
議, 店家說, 依據標準, 蒼蠅要吃一萬隻才會有事, 我們只
有一隻, 要連吃一萬碗才會有事, 我們是合乎標準的, 是你
們太過緊張, 這種說法說得通嗎?
對食品來說, 一定是正面表列的東西才能添加, 其他的東西
就是不能加,
當然, 不能加的東西有時還是會不小心吃到, 這時就需要標準
來決定需要洗胃, 灌腸, ...... 等行動, 但不代表在明知道 "有"
的情形下, 大家吃沒關係,
全站熱搜
留言列表
往事如瘋 (3)
